Version 1 (Original Post)
Published by Rahul Sharma · Aug 9, 2026 5:37 AM
Original Publication
Events Log
Post originally created and published to the Global Hub.
Original Title
What are the main architectural differences between CLIP-based embeddings and generative multimodal models?
Original Summary
Practical answer and configuration guide for What are the main architectural differences between CLIP-based embeddings and generative multimodal models?.
Original Content
Most RAG quality issues come from bad document chunking rather than the LLM model itself. Here is how to optimize retrieval:
1. **Use Semantic Structure Splitting**: Split Markdown and PDFs on header boundaries (`
## `) rather than arbitrary character counts to keep tables and code blocks intact.
```python
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
chunk_size=512,
chunk_overlap=64,
separators=["
## ", "
### ", "
", "
", " "]
)
```
2. **Combine Vector + Keyword Search**: Pair vector embeddings with BM25 keyword search, then pass top results to a Cohere Reranker model. This catches both semantic context and exact product/code matches.
3. **Parent-Child Indexing**: Store 128-token chunks for vector retrieval, but return the surrounding 1024-token parent section to the LLM.
Original Sources
https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/index.html
https://huggingface.co/docs/diffusers/index